CONCLUSIONS & APPENDICES
Appendix 3:
Questionable Witnesses
Appendix 4:
Paparazzi Evidence
Appendix 7:
Plastic Sample Boxes
THE EVIDENCE
© 2019 John Douglas Bryant. All rights reserved.
•
Diana was NOT trapped in the Mercedes as stated.
•
Bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones WAS wearing a seat belt.
•
The French police were wrong about how far the paparazzi were behind the Mercedes
•
The French police were wrong about the speeds of the paparazzi vehicles and the Mercedes.
•
Two cars hit the Mercedes.
•
Some alleged witnesses invented their stories.
•
Some witnesses were pressured to change their evidence.
•
Ritz Hotel and Etoile Limousine staff gave false information, which implicated Henri Paul.
•
The French authorities destroyed crucial evidence.
•
Incriminating ‘evidence’ was planted in Henri Paul’s home.
•
The choice of hospital was pre-planned, which raises further questions.
•
The medical staff delayed Diana’s treatment, unwittingly or otherwise.
•
The actions of the paparazzi were covered up.
CONCLUSIONS OF THIS INVESTIGATION
THE CRASH
•
The genuine Henri Paul blood samples were labelled after the autopsy for DNA testing.
•
The blood tested for alcohol was taken from a body that came from the refrigerator room. Henri Paul’s body was not refrigerated.
•
There was no second Henri Paul autopsy on September 4th, 1997.
•
There was no CDT test.
•
Henri Paul was neither drunk nor speeding.
HENRI PAUL
THE VERDICT
•
The paparazzi caused the crash and failed to provide assistance to the injured.
•
The white Fiat Uno was a red herring, invented to exonerate the paparazzi.
•
There was no substantive search for the white Fiat Uno.
•
If the rear light fragments found in the tunnel truly came from a Fiat Uno, it could have been any colour.
THE WHITE FIAT UNO